With Arlen Specter’s unsurprising lurch to the Dark Side, I’m reading more of the neoRepublican, “moderate” garbage that’s been slung about since 2006. I’m wondering why it seems that so many Republican pundits seem so averse to taking principled stands. These so-called “young” voices within the party are so ready to just dump every single defining issue for perceived (and ultimately short term) gain. We’ve been ceding ground since 2000, and I’m not so sure that it’s worked out for us.
There’s nothing wrong with restructuring–it’s a necessary part of party growth–but becoming a pale shadow of the opposition party benefits no one except the party in power. People will see no difference in the parties and just vote for the guys in office at the moment, regardless of political affiliation. Am I the only one who believes that standing on principle and losing in the short term is better than winning for all the wrong reasons? I know that I’m not.
For one thing, the opposition to gay marriage is a klunker, in my opinion. Homosexuals will not further devalue marriage anymore than heteros have. Have you seen our divorce rate? Marriage does not mean what it once did, and teh gays have not had much to do with that. We’ve rogered this up all on our own, and I think we should let the voters of each state decide whether to permit same sex marriage. Courts should have nothing to do with it, and amending constitutions to define marriage as one man and one woman is a bit extreme. I believe you can support same sex marriage and “still” be a “real” conservative. Your gay marriage isn’t hurting me one bit.
Abortion, however, is not debatable. Gun rights, federalism, smaller government and fiscal responsibility are not either. A vigorous and, if need be, preemptive attitude toward national security is non-negotiable.
Perhaps I’m wrong. Perhaps I am too much of an absolutist. Perhaps it is too much to ask that the party I’ve decided to be identified with be willing to stand for something. Giving ourselves over to the temptation to morph into an imitation of the opposition is suicide. Once we are completely ruled by the polls, we’re worthless. Love him or hate him, George W Bush could have cared less about the opinion polls, instead allowing his morality and intellect to guide him. He stood for something, at least.
If the GOP gives into the whining and cajoling to pull center-left-ish, we’ll lose our soul.