Have you ever read Toby Harnden at The Telegraph? I come across his stuff frequently–and always swear that I will read him regularly, and then promptly forget to bookmark him–and I always enjoy it. He’s an excellent writer.
Anyway, he’s got a great piece about that loser, Julian Assange, and the cultish following he’s garnered amongst the professionally paranoid and largely unhinged crowd. I actually find it incredibly difficult to find the right words for Assange and his tinfoil hat army, on account of the emotion this whole situation stirs in me–with the dead Afghan informers and all–so it’s nice to have a link to give you that isn’t, you know, extremely pissed off. Harnden makes several good points, and does a good job of simply asking the questions that should be asked about this douchebag.
Among the Wikileaks groupies – an online crowd that seems to swell by the day – Assange didn’t even need to attempt to distract. For people who question every aspect of the American government and military, they are surprisingly eager to suspend all critical judgment in this instance.
I’m glad somebody noticed. I wonder what the ratio of Assange’s true believers to XFiles superfans would turn out to be, if scientific polling were to be attempted. Probably the same as true believers to idiots with The Lone Gunman complete series DVD set. I wonder if it confused them when their hero, Stephen Colbert, called out Assange on the “Collateral Murder” hit piece. Their heads must have exploded.
Most seriously, however, the documents contained the names of numerous Afghans who had helped British and American forces. Just in case the Taliban have a problem locating them, they also included grid locations and villages along with the names.
[ . . . ]
In fact, he is a highly political campaigner, and his message that he wants only to protect the vulnerable is undermined by the possibility that ordinary Afghans may already have died because of Wikileaks.
What a hero. Way to pick ‘em, Wikifreaks.